I wasn't particularly inspired by week 2 of CLMOOC
...at least no muses were speaking to me.
So cleared my mind
and went through CLMOOC's timeline
with an empty mind
and submerged myself in the stream.
A posting by Stephanie Loomis popped out -
on Hybrid Pedagogy.
I read it.
It was interesting.
You should read it.
I remixed the image.
Sunday, July 24, 2016
Thursday, July 21, 2016
I am actually quite happy that I ended up taking the refresher course on qualitative research methods. While the concepts weren't new to me, I did love the opportunity to actually work on part of my dissertation proposal and receive some feedback before I actually start the seminar in which I develop the first good draft of my proposal (EDDE 805). I also liked being the same course as members of other cohorts. This gives me both an opportunity to see what's a little down the road for me, by observing and talking to people in the cohorts ahead of me, and it gives me an opportunity to relive some of the things that I already went through these past few years, via cohorts that started after my own cohort started.
So, this summer I worked on getting my research methods chapter done. Well, there is much more to be done (can't base a research methods section only on one textbook!), but the foundations and rationales are there. I ordered a couple of books on Case Study as a method since that's where I am heading at the moment, which I will use to bolster this chapter either in the fall, or next spring as I am taking EDDE 806. The current version of the chapter is 15 pages. It expect to the adding 5-6 more pages of background once I get to reading the additional books on case studies, so that page count seems respectable. I think anything beyond that is just overkill. There is no reason for a dissertation chapter on the research methods that is more than that.
One of the interesting pieces of feedback I received had to do with potentially having to discuss (in my methods section) why I didn't pick other methods to explore my problem. It appears that the constitution of my committee will ultimately be the deciding factor as to whether or not I need to say why I didn't pick ethnography, discourse analysis, phenomenology, or any other method to explore my questions. At this point in time it seems rather odd that I would be asked to say why I didn't use other methods. It makes sense to defend why I picked the case study approach as it provides a boundary and a rationale for my choices. However discussing other methods in details and why they don't work seems rather pedantic and unnecessary. Your thoughts?
Now, time to go off and start my literature review for chapter 2 of my proposal...
Tuesday, July 19, 2016
I am not sure why my Surface Pro 3 camera decided to hyper correct the lighting in my home office, but it seems that the only way for me to be properly lit was to look at my secondary monitor, which gives the appearance of sidetalking... Oh well. It was a good session nevertheless :)
Monday, July 18, 2016
Just a little documentation of some audio-visual texts that I was part of this past week. Lots of fun, and mentally stimulating, despite the technical issues I had :-) Here is a session I buddied for last week with Robin DeRosa and Daniel Lynds from DigPed Lab PEI
Friday, July 15, 2016
Over the years I've tried out almost every social network I could get my hands on. What can I say, I love tinkering and trying new things :-). However, on source of irritation these days are networks like ResearchGate and Academia.edu. I like listing the few things that I co-author (or author for that matter) in a variety of places because (let's face it), most people aren't going to find you just by looking at your blog or website. That said, when you're listing your fine work on these sites there is an option to upload the file itself - to make it easier for other members of that community to access your writing.
I don't mind putting up a pre-publication version of what I write but I do mind needlessly uploading PDF files of articles that are published in open access journals! The whole point of publishing in open access journals is so that you don't have to upload copies elsewhere (and for people to be able to find them for free!). Yet, social networks like Academia.edu and ResearchGate do not allow me to provide a URL to the open access journal, or my website, where I can point people to without needing to upload one more thing :-/. So, as a consequence I were emails telling me that some user requested a copy of my paper on xyz. I would normally send them a kind email pointing them to the open access resource, my website, or the institutional repository I contribute to, but I don't even know if these requests are even legitimate. After all, social networks like LinkedIn and classmates.com (way back when!) said that people (former classmates or business acquaintances) were looking to connect with members, but those were actually false and meant to get more people to sign up. Hence, I look at some of these social networking emails with a bit of a skeptical eye. I don't want to upload my papers in a gated community when the open access option is perfectly viable!