Anatomy of an unworkshop
This is partly a rant, and partly a reference to an interesting blog piece I read earlier today. I was reading this blog article about the anatomy of an unworkshop . Now the content within the blog post is pretty interested, what I take issue with is the naming convention: the unworkshop . Sometimes I feel like academics have nothing better to do than come up with silly names to describe a slightly different name for a slightly different process and it's just not necessary (unconference and edupunk also fall within this category). His methodology sounds good to me, but I really do not see the need for giving it the 'unworkshops' name. After all when I sign up for workshops I don't sign up for socratic workshops or aristotelian workshops, so in reality the methodology does not matter in the naming convention of the event. Am I making too much of this?