Different levels of "m"

Week 2 of mobiMOOC is underway - and there's been a ton of discussion during week 1! (much more than I expected actually).  It's amazing to me than mLearning has become synonymous (these days) with smartphones, apps on those smartphones and mobile data.  One doesn't have to go too far back in the research literature to find mLearning to be something that was based on regular phones, using regular SMS and MMS messages, and even voice communications!

In the shuffle in the developed world we seem to have lost that simplicity of just voice and SMS/MMS and we've gone with things that require expensive handsets and expensive data plans.  Even if you get a sort of cheap Android phone (certainly cheaper and an iPhone) you still have to pay for a data plan.  I don't know how data rates are in countries other than the US, but until recently (recent being 3 years of fewer) data on a phone cost a lot and you just didn't get that much of it!

I know it's tempting to go the App route, or mobile-web route, but what about lean mLearning? Back in the days computers had limited availability of things like RAM and hard drive space. This made developers THINK about how they would best implement their program so that they can get the most out of it on limited hardware.  I think that THIS is the mindset that designers of mLearning and designers of mLearning applications need to be in to NOT just think of those of us who are privileged in our position to be able to afford a smartphone and a data plan, but also those who have access to voice and SMS only.

Comments

Apostolos K. ("AK") said…
I agree with your remark Apostolos. We need to keep our minds set on lean and simple (m)learning, where engaging design and accessibility increase the learner experience.
April 13, 2011 at 9:50 AM
Apostolos K. ("AK") said…
Hi Apostolos,
You raise some very valuable points that may not occur to those with easy access to technology. It is perhaps easier to assume that less-developed countries are more limited, but like many other global concerns, limited access to technology affects us locally as well. Thank you for the reminder!
I've taken your suggestion to heart as I ponder a potential project for mobiMOOC; I like the concept of text4baby.org and wonder about creating something SMS based that could be a valuable learning resource for teachers working on call. Would love to hear any thoughts you may have.
~Sheena
April 13, 2011 at 7:46 PM
Apostolos K. ("AK") said…
Tell me more about the project you're thinking about. What do these teachers do on call? I think that something along the lines of text4baby has potential both on its own and as part of a "regular" education environment.
April 15, 2011 at 2:04 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Latour: Third Source of Uncertainty - Objects have agency too!

Image
Continuing on my exploration of ANT, and asynchronous and indirect dialogue with Latour - this blog post will cover the third source of uncertainty, which according to Latour, is that Objects have agency too! As with the previous blog posts, I've pulled out quotes from the book that seemed interesting, or that I reacted to in some way, and I am responding to them here. no tie can be said to be durable and made of social stuff (p. 66) This quote seems to continue Latour's assertion that there is no such thing as "social" or "social stuff" and that "social", or the meaning of needs to be negotiated and better understood.  It also continues the thought that social can only be seen from the actions of its actors, the traces they leave behind, and that these bonds are not durable because they need continuous reinforcement. I guess Social is a perishable item. Left to its own devices, a power relationship that mobilizes nothing but social skil
Read more

MOOC participation - open door policy and analytics

The other day I was reading ZML Didaktik on the topic of MOOC participants. In MOOCs, one of the big questions is why are people lurking and not participating? If more than 500 people join a MOOC, why are only 10% contributing with any amount of regularity?  On the same blog, in a previous blog post, I had commented (it was an open stream of thought really) that perhaps there should be an open enrollment period, and then if the system sees that certain participants are bellow a threshold of activity, the system may give them the option to self-identify as a lurker, or un-register from the class. This line of thought went along a view that compared to the traditional classroom; in a traditional classroom students register for the course, they can attend classes for a week and then decide whether or not they want to stay with the course or not. If they do stay with the course they know that there is a certain amount of "lurking" that they can get away with, but they do have
Read more

You've been punk'd! However, that was an educational experience

Image
It's now the end of Teaching Goes Massive: New Skills Required (aka #massiveteaching) on coursera. Well, almost, we still have a couple of days left. I guess that the lesson here is that we were (the "learners") were punk'd† by Paul-Olivier Dehaye of the Univerisity of Zurich. After that last blog post (and subsequent pickup of the post by George Siemens and others) Inside Higher Education and the Chronicle wanted to chat with me about this MOOC experience. I only had time for one of the two before things went to press, so my 15 minutes of fame went to IHE.  Both IHE and the C hronicle have written about the topic, and have received some information from Coursera on the incident.  Others have also written about it (see here , here and here ) It's surprising to me that the University, and Coursera, waited until after this thing was a big issue in order to respond in the class, and clue people into what was happening. On Wednesday (day 3 of Week 3/3 of the
Read more